ANR Programme 2009-2013
image of courtroom
A Joint Programme on Justice and Governance in India and South Asia
(Hosted by Centre for Himalayan Studies)

Related: 2nd LASSNET Conf., Dec. 2010

Starting July 4, 2010 - Ending June 27, 2020

"SITING LAW": Second Conference of the Law and Social Sciences Research Network (LASSnet), Dec.27-30, 2010, Pune

Siting Law
Second Conference of the Law and Social Sciences Research Network (LASSnet), DECEMBER 27-30, 2010
Venue: Foundation for Liberal and Management Education (FLAME), Pune, India

The following is merely a summary of the call issued by Lassnet. For the full text and details, see the Call for papers

See also the SCHEDULE.

VIDEOS of the Conference are available now (Dec. 2011)on >>> LASSnet's Blog and >>> Here


The Law and Social Science Research Network (LASSnet) was established in 2008 to bring together scholars, lawyers and doctoral researchers engaged in the research and teaching of issues connected with the law in different social sciences in contemporary South Asian contexts. [...]The inaugural LASS conference was held at the Centre for the Study of Law and Governance, Jawarharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, in January 2009. In the inaugural conference of LASSnet, we saw a number of conversations across disciplines among legal scholars, practitioners, activists, anthropologists, historians, philosophers, social theorists, political scientists, economists and science and technology scholars. For the second edition of the LASSnet conference we have chosen to continue with such inter-disciplinary excavations, and to venture further afield.

By focussing on the multiple sites of law we seek to open out ways of thinking about the social life of law and legality and its relation to questions of violence and injustice in South Asia. We recognize that the project of modern law emerged through the universalizing of a particular form of rationality and established itself in a large part of the world through the violent history of colonialism. The project of law and the project of modernity often became synonymous, and legal scholarship also tended to reproduce this relationship.

We are therefore interested in enquiries that critique monolithic forms of legal rationality. If the project of critiquing is to have any relevance, it is in its ability to conjure possibilities and alternatives that have remained unimagined. [...]To be attentive to the multiple sites of law is also to be attentive to the role played by the social sciences - particularly anthropology and history- in opening out the way we think of law as a cultural and not merely as a legal process. [...]The routes which social scientists and legal scholars took to the sites of law, and the methodologies that they developed have traditionally been accounted for in terms of their differences. We wish to see this difference as being precisely the common ground on which we stand, and as the basis on which we can cite scholarship about legal experience differently.